Supreme Court Guidelines for Speedy Disposal of Execution of Decree
All Courts dealing with Suits and Execution Proceedings shall
Mandatorily follow the below-mentioned directions:
1. In suits relating to delivery of possession, the court
must examine the parties to the suit under Order X in
relation to third party interest and further exercise the power under
Order XI Rule 14 asking parties to disclose and produce
documents, upon oath, which are in possession of the parties
including declaration pertaining to third party interest in
such properties.
3. In appropriate cases, where the possession is not in
dispute and not a question of fact for adjudication before the
Court, the Court may appoint Commissioner to assess the
accurate description and status of the property.
4. After examination of parties under Order X or
production of documents under Order XI or receipt of
commission report, the Court must add all necessary or
proper parties to the suit, so as to avoid multiplicity of
proceedings and also make such joinder of cause of action in
the same suit.
5. Under Order XL Rule 1 of CPC, a Court Receiver can be
appointed to monitor the status of the property in question
as custodia legis for proper adjudication of the matter.
6. The Court must, before passing the decree,
pertaining to
7. delivery of possession of a property ensure that the
decree is unambiguous so as to not only contain clear
description of the property but also having regard to the
status of the property.
8. In a money suit, the Court must invariably resort to
Order XXI Rule 11, ensuring immediate execution of decree
for payment of money on oral application.
9. In a suit for payment of money, before settlement of
issues, the defendant may be required to disclose his assets
on oath, to the extent that he is being made liable in a suit.
The Court may further, at any stage, in appropriate cases
during the pendency of suit, using powers under Section 151
CPC, demand security to ensure satisfaction of any decree.
10. The Court exercising jurisdiction under Section 47 or
under Order XXI of CPC, must not issue notice on an
application of third-party claiming rights in a mechanical
manner. Further, the Court should refrain from entertaining
any such application(s) that has already been considered by
the Court while adjudicating the suit or which raises any
such issue which otherwise could have been raised and
determined during adjudication of suit if due diligence was
exercised by the applicant.
11. The Court should allow taking of evidence during the
execution proceedings only in exceptional and rare cases
where the question of fact could not be decided by resorting
to any other expeditious method like appointment of
Commissioner or calling for electronic materials including
photographs or video with affidavits.
12. The Court must in appropriate cases where it finds the
objection or resistance or claim to be frivolous or mala fide,
resort to Sub-rule (2) of Rule 98 of Order XXI as well as grant
compensatory costs in accordance with Section 35A.
13. Under section 60 of CPC the term “…in name of the
judgment- debtor or by another person in trust for him or on
his behalf” should be read liberally to incorporate any other
person from whom he may have the ability to derive share,
profit or property.
14. The Executing Court must dispose of the Execution
Proceedings within six months from the date of filing, which
may be extended only by recording reasons in writing for
such delay.
15. The Executing Court may on satisfaction of the fact that
it is not possible to execute the decree without police
assistance, direct the concerned Police Station to provide
police assistance to such officials who are working towards
execution of the decree. Further, in case an offence against
the public servant while discharging his duties is brought to
the knowledge of the Court, the same must be dealt
stringently in accordance with law.
16. The Judicial Academies must prepare manuals and
ensure continuous training through appropriate mediums to
the Court personnel/staff executing the warrants, carrying
out attachment and sale and any other official duties for
executing orders issued by the Executing Courts.
43. We further direct all the High Courts to reconsider and
update all the Rules relating to Execution of Decrees, made under
exercise of its powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India and Section 122 of CPC, within one year of the date of this
Order. The High Courts must ensure that the Rules are in
consonance with CPC and the above directions, with an
endeavour to expedite the process of execution with the use of
Information Technology tools. Until such time these Rules are
brought into existence, the above directions shall remain
enforceable.
No comments:
Post a Comment